Dehradun Police have arrested an accused who had been wanted for 02 years in a case involving the alleged taking away of a minor girl. The arrest was made in Panchkula, Haryana, by a team linked to Rajpur police station.
Police said the accused was carrying a 50,000 reward and had remained out of reach for 2 years. The operation was carried out as part of the strategy of the Dehradun senior superintendent of police to trace long-absconding accused.
Arrest in Panchkula
The Rajpur police station team located the accused in Panchkula and took him into custody. The available details identify the location of the arrest as Panchkula, Haryana, while the case is connected with Rajpur police station in Dehradun.
The case concerns allegations that a minor girl was taken away. The arrest does not by itself establish guilt, and the allegations will be dealt with through the legal process.
What the arrest means
The action brings an accused who had avoided arrest for 02 years into police custody. It also marks progress in a case involving a minor, although the available police information does not provide further details about the circumstances of the incident or the next court proceeding.
The accused’s arrest follows efforts by Dehradun Police to track him outside Uttarakhand. The police announcement did not provide his name or disclose further details about the investigation.
Conclusion
Dehradun Police have arrested the 50,000-reward accused in the Rajpur police station case from Panchkula, Haryana, after he remained wanted for 02 years. Further legal proceedings will determine the case.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q. Which police unit made the arrest?
The arrest was made by Dehradun Police through a team linked to Rajpur police station.
Q. Where was the accused arrested?
Police arrested him in Panchkula, Haryana.
Q. How long had the accused been wanted?
He had been wanted for 02 years.
Q. What reward was announced for the accused?
A 50,000 reward was announced for information leading to his capture.
Q. What is the case about?
The case involves allegations that a minor girl was taken away. The available information does not establish the accused’s guilt.
